Plot
y
x
2026 at a glance
Teams3,708
Matches18,169
Median EPAM37.3
Top team4414357.5
Top over median+320.2
Mean score119.4±85.1
Events310
Countries33
2026 superlatives
Best auto205683.8
Best teleop4414283.9
Best endgame490721.9
Best record441497%
Most wins118118
Top OPR4414429.5
Best DPR9264-71.5
Biggest overperformer248036%
Top 25 of 2026
| # | Team | EPAM | Auto | Teleop | Endgame | Record | Win% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4414HighTide | 357.5 | 75.2 | 283.9 | -1.6 | 70-2 | 97% |
| 2 | 254The Cheesy Poofs | 327.9 | 78.4 | 249.6 | -0.2 | 65-6 | 92% |
| 3 | 7769The CREW | 313.6 | 67.6 | 245.7 | 0.3 | 70-5 | 93% |
| 4 | 1323MadTown Robotics | 309.1 | 73.6 | 236.8 | -1.4 | 69-4 | 95% |
| 5 | 2056OP Robotics | 301.8 | 83.8 | 218.3 | -0.3 | 63-10 | 86% |
| 6 | 27Team RUSH | 294.9 | 73.8 | 220.7 | 0.4 | 82-6 | 93% |
| 7 | 2481Roboteers | 290.3 | 63.5 | 226.7 | 0.1 | 44-8 | 85% |
| 8 | 1114Simbotics | 287.6 | 73.2 | 214.0 | 0.4 | 62-7 | 90% |
| 9 | 125NUTRONs | 284.5 | 54.6 | 229.9 | -0.0 | 68-17-1 | 80% |
| 10 | 5687The Outliers | 282.6 | 73.5 | 209.0 | 0.1 | 66-16-1 | 80% |
| 11 | 2910Jack in the Bot | 280.9 | 48.9 | 232.0 | 0.0 | 53-23 | 70% |
| 12 | 1678Citrus Circuits | 280.8 | 60.0 | 220.2 | 0.6 | 61-9 | 87% |
| 13 | 9470Ctrl-Alt-Defeat | 279.5 | 61.5 | 216.9 | 1.2 | 60-13 | 82% |
| 14 | 7558ALT-F4 | 278.4 | 54.4 | 224.5 | -0.5 | 51-17 | 75% |
| 15 | 1690Orbit | 277.2 | 66.6 | 210.6 | 0.1 | 16-4 | 80% |
| 16 | 6369Mercenary Robotics | 274.0 | 58.9 | 215.2 | -0.2 | 77-9 | 90% |
| 17 | 6800Valor | 267.6 | 55.9 | 212.4 | -0.7 | 62-10 | 86% |
| 18 | 3467Windham Windup | 266.8 | 48.6 | 218.1 | 0.1 | 75-10 | 88% |
| 19 | 9128ITKAN Robotics | 264.6 | 57.9 | 206.8 | -0.1 | 60-7 | 90% |
| 20 | 1796RoboTigers | 263.3 | 54.2 | 209.1 | -0.1 | 48-7 | 87% |
| 21 | 2046Bear Metal | 260.6 | 56.8 | 204.0 | -0.2 | 78-16 | 83% |
| 22 | 6329The Bucks' Wrath | 260.4 | 59.0 | 201.5 | -0.1 | 61-15-1 | 80% |
| 23 | 9483Overcharge | 260.4 | 57.1 | 203.4 | -0.1 | 38-6 | 86% |
| 24 | 1768Nashoba Robotics | 259.2 | 42.4 | 216.9 | -0.0 | 75-22 | 77% |
| 25 | 1987Broncobots | 257.6 | 49.2 | 208.6 | -0.2 | 54-6 | 90% |
Phase leaders
top 10Auto
Teleop
Best records
≥12 matches| # | Team | Record | Played | Win% | At least | EPAM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4414HighTide | 70-2 | 72 | 97% | 90% | 357.5 |
| 2 | 1323MadTown Robotics | 69-4 | 73 | 95% | 87% | 309.1 |
| 3 | 27Team RUSH | 82-6 | 88 | 93% | 86% | 294.9 |
| 4 | 1706Ratchet Rockers | 44-2 | 46 | 96% | 85% | 254.8 |
| 5 | 7769The CREW | 70-5 | 75 | 93% | 85% | 313.6 |
| 6 | 118Robonauts | 118-14 | 132 | 89% | 83% | 182.4 |
| 7 | 254The Cheesy Poofs | 65-6 | 71 | 92% | 83% | 327.9 |
| 8 | 6369Mercenary Robotics | 77-9 | 86 | 90% | 81% | 274.0 |
| 9 | 1114Simbotics | 62-7 | 69 | 90% | 81% | 287.6 |
| 10 | 9128ITKAN Robotics | 60-7 | 67 | 90% | 80% | 264.6 |
| 11 | 1987Broncobots | 54-6 | 60 | 90% | 80% | 257.6 |
| 12 | 316LUNATECS | 59-7 | 66 | 89% | 80% | 213.7 |
| 13 | 3467Windham Windup | 75-10 | 85 | 88% | 80% | 266.8 |
| 14 | 5584ICRobotics | 15-0 | 15 | 100% | 80% | 156.1 |
| 15 | 1833Team BEAN | 60-8 | 68 | 88% | 78% | 232.9 |
Beat their rating
≥12 matches| # | Team | EPAM | Record | Won | Expected | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2480Iron Paws | 36.0 | 11-3 | 79% | 43% | +36% |
| 2 | 5584ICRobotics | 156.1 | 15-0 | 100% | 65% | +35% |
| 3 | 6874Mediterra | 26.5 | 9-4 | 69% | 42% | +28% |
| 4 | 6996Koalafied | 64.7 | 13-4 | 76% | 49% | +27% |
| 5 | 10526Orcas | 61.3 | 9-3 | 75% | 49% | +26% |
| 6 | 4739Normanhurst Nitro | 23.8 | 9-5 | 64% | 39% | +26% |
| 7 | 7439Qubit Robotics | 32.1 | 8-4 | 67% | 42% | +24% |
| 8 | 4838Under Currents | 32.6 | 20-10 | 67% | 42% | +24% |
| 9 | 10392Brawley Robocats | 18.1 | 8-5 | 62% | 38% | +24% |
| 10 | 11244Avrasya Robotics | 22.2 | 17-10 | 63% | 39% | +24% |
| 11 | 4795Eastbots | 129.7 | 53-10 | 84% | 61% | +23% |
| 12 | 291CIA - Creativity In Action | 57.1 | 10-4 | 71% | 48% | +23% |
Fell short of their rating
≥12 matches| # | Team | EPAM | Record | Won | Expected | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7903Tigers | 3.9 | 1-16 | 6% | 32% | −26% |
| 2 | 2852DM Robotics | 62.3 | 10-32 | 24% | 49% | −25% |
| 3 | 6352LAUNCH TEAM | 98.0 | 6-13 | 32% | 56% | −25% |
| 4 | 1446Robo Knights | 25.9 | 4-20 | 17% | 41% | −24% |
| 5 | 467Center of Mass | 81.0 | 12-30 | 29% | 52% | −24% |
| 6 | 325Respawn Robotics | 46.9 | 4-14 | 22% | 45% | −23% |
| 7 | 11100Team Epsilon | 41.4 | 4-15 | 21% | 44% | −23% |
| 8 | 7724Molokai Robotics | 21.9 | 2-10 | 17% | 40% | −23% |
| 9 | 34Rockets | 36.6 | 4-16 | 20% | 43% | −23% |
| 10 | 10629Bath High School Bee-Botics | 11.7 | 3-21 | 13% | 35% | −23% |
| 11 | 8521CyberLions | 22.9 | 4-20 | 17% | 39% | −22% |
| 12 | 6762Oscats | 23.5 | 4-20 | 17% | 39% | −22% |
Where the models disagree
top 10EPAM rates them higher
Scoring and defense
top 10Bonus RP specialists
top 10Energized
Supercharged
Phase specialists
EPAM ≥ 71.0Most even teams
EPAM ≥ 71.0Regions by depth
≥25 teams| # | Region | Teams | Median | P90 | Best | Top 100 | vs Field |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | China | 48 | 56.4 | 125.6 | 8214 | 2 (2%) | +19.1 |
| 2 | New England | 200 | 48.5 | 165.4 | 125 | 10 (10%) | +11.2 |
| 3 | Pacific Northwest | 126 | 48.2 | 144.0 | 2910 | 7 (7%) | +10.9 |
| 4 | Indiana | 68 | 46.5 | 128.9 | 7457 | 2 (2%) | +9.2 |
| 5 | Ontario | 119 | 46.1 | 191.1 | 2056 | 12 (12%) | +8.8 |
| 6 | Chesapeake | 117 | 45.1 | 131.0 | 2106 | 1 (1%) | +7.8 |
| 7 | Illinois | 55 | 43.9 | 147.4 | 2481 | 1 (1%) | +6.6 |
| 8 | California | 291 | 42.6 | 166.7 | 4414 | 18 (18%) | +5.3 |
| 9 | Oklahoma | 34 | 41.6 | 79.7 | 3931 | 0 (0%) | +4.3 |
| 10 | Colorado | 39 | 40.2 | 154.5 | 4499 | 1 (1%) | +2.9 |
| 11 | Israel | 62 | 40.1 | 123.2 | 1690 | 1 (1%) | +2.8 |
| 12 | Wisconsin | 71 | 39.7 | 127.8 | 1732 | 1 (1%) | +2.4 |
| 13 | Mid-Atlantic | 141 | 39.4 | 129.4 | 316 | 4 (4%) | +2.1 |
| 14 | Ohio | 60 | 38.8 | 122.4 | 695 | 2 (2%) | +1.5 |
| 15 | Michigan | 530 | 38.4 | 132.6 | 7769 | 11 (11%) | +1.1 |
| 16 | Texas | 179 | 36.6 | 129.8 | 6369 | 4 (4%) | -0.7 |
| 17 | New York | 152 | 36.5 | 116.5 | 1796 | 5 (5%) | -0.8 |
| 18 | Pennsylvania | 28 | 35.6 | 113.0 | 117 | 1 (1%) | -1.7 |
| 19 | Canada | 66 | 35.5 | 88.0 | 4421 | 0 (0%) | -1.8 |
| 20 | Missouri | 65 | 35.4 | 122.8 | 1987 | 3 (3%) | -1.9 |
| 21 | Taiwan | 35 | 34.6 | 94.1 | 8595 | 0 (0%) | -2.8 |
| 22 | Minnesota | 187 | 33.4 | 101.6 | 2052 | 0 (0%) | -3.9 |
| 23 | South Carolina | 38 | 32.8 | 76.4 | 4451 | 0 (0%) | -4.5 |
| 24 | Peachtree | 74 | 32.7 | 117.4 | 1833 | 1 (1%) | -4.6 |
| 25 | Tennessee | 27 | 32.7 | 129.5 | 4020 | 0 (0%) | -4.6 |
| 26 | Iowa | 29 | 32.5 | 111.5 | 4646 | 1 (1%) | -4.8 |
| 27 | Florida | 88 | 29.8 | 108.0 | 180 | 1 (1%) | -7.5 |
| 28 | North Carolina | 89 | 29.2 | 93.0 | 9496 | 1 (1%) | -8.1 |
| 29 | Louisiana | 38 | 27.7 | 111.7 | 8044 | 1 (1%) | -9.6 |
| 30 | Mexico | 89 | 27.6 | 110.8 | 4400 | 1 (1%) | -9.7 |
| 31 | Brazil | 68 | 26.3 | 76.2 | 1156 | 1 (1%) | -11.0 |
| 32 | Türkiye | 203 | 25.5 | 74.5 | 9483 | 2 (2%) | -11.8 |
| 33 | Arizona | 39 | 25.3 | 89.5 | 498 | 1 (1%) | -12.0 |
| 34 | Australia | 39 | 23.6 | 100.4 | 5584 | 0 (0%) | -13.7 |
Districts against the rest
share of the top 100Best team of each region
15 regions| # | Region | Team | EPAM |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | California | 4414HighTide | 357.5 |
| 2 | Michigan | 7769The CREW | 313.6 |
| 3 | Ontario | 2056OP Robotics | 301.8 |
| 4 | Illinois | 2481Roboteers | 290.3 |
| 5 | New England | 125NUTRONs | 284.5 |
| 6 | Pacific Northwest | 2910Jack in the Bot | 280.9 |
| 7 | Israel | 1690Orbit | 277.2 |
| 8 | Texas | 6369Mercenary Robotics | 274.0 |
| 9 | New York | 1796RoboTigers | 263.3 |
| 10 | Türkiye | 9483Overcharge | 260.4 |
| 11 | Missouri | 1987Broncobots | 257.6 |
| 12 | Louisiana | 8044Denham Venom | 256.4 |
| 13 | North Carolina | 9496LYNK | 256.1 |
| 14 | Arizona | 498The Cobra Commanders | 242.5 |
| 15 | Peachtree | 1833Team BEAN | 232.9 |
Strongest states and provinces
≥15 teams| # | State | Teams | Median | P90 | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shanghai, China | 15 | 64.4 | 119.5 | 6941 |
| 2 | Maine | 16 | 53.3 | 223.1 | 5687 |
| 3 | New Hampshire | 40 | 52.1 | 176.5 | 3467 |
| 4 | Massachusetts | 71 | 51.9 | 156.8 | 125 |
| 5 | Washington | 86 | 50.6 | 144.6 | 2910 |
| 6 | Québec, Canada | 34 | 49.7 | 94.8 | 9406 |
| 7 | Virginia | 72 | 48.7 | 126.8 | 2106 |
| 8 | Indiana | 68 | 46.5 | 128.9 | 7457 |
| 9 | Ontario, Canada | 119 | 46.1 | 191.1 | 2056 |
| 10 | Connecticut | 55 | 45.9 | 159.2 | 195 |
| 11 | Idaho | 16 | 45.4 | 108.1 | 2122 |
| 12 | Pennsylvania | 77 | 44.0 | 142.4 | 341 |
Strongest countries
≥15 teamsStrongest fields
top teams listed on 271 of 310 events| # | Event | Stage | Teams | Top EPAM | Rated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Einstein Field | Championship | 48 | 301.9 | 10 |
| 2 | Chezy Champs | Offseason | 43 | 276.9 | 10 |
| 3 | Indiana Robotics Invitational | Offseason | 50 | 254.7 | 10 |
| 4 | Curie Division | Championship | 74 | 251.3 | 10 |
| 5 | FIRST California Northern State Championship | District Champs | 61 | 249.3 | 10 |
| 6 | Hopper Division | Championship | 74 | 248.8 | 10 |
| 7 | Newton Division | Championship | 75 | 240.0 | 10 |
| 8 | Daly Division | Championship | 75 | 235.7 | 10 |
| 9 | Milstein Division | Championship | 74 | 235.6 | 10 |
| 10 | Galileo Division | Championship | 75 | 233.1 | 10 |
| 11 | Archimedes Division | Championship | 75 | 232.3 | 10 |
| 12 | Johnson Division | Championship | 75 | 221.5 | 10 |
Biggest events
registered teams| # | Event | Stage | Place | Teams | Quals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archimedes Division | Championship | Texas | 75 | 125 |
| 2 | Daly Division | Championship | Texas | 75 | 125 |
| 3 | Galileo Division | Championship | Texas | 75 | 125 |
| 4 | Johnson Division | Championship | Texas | 75 | 125 |
| 5 | Newton Division | Championship | Texas | 75 | 125 |
| 6 | Curie Division | Championship | Texas | 74 | 124 |
| 7 | Hopper Division | Championship | Texas | 74 | 124 |
| 8 | Milstein Division | Championship | Texas | 74 | 124 |
| 9 | FIRST Mid-Atlantic District Championship | District Champs | Pennsylvania | 66 | 132 |
| 10 | FIRST California Northern State Championship | District Champs | California | 61 | 120 |
| 11 | FIRST California Southern State Championship presented by Qualcomm | District Champs | California | 61 | 120 |
| 12 | New York Tech Valley Regional | Week 7 | New York | 60 | 80 |
The season stage by stage
11 stages| Stage | Events | Entries | Quals |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | 12 | 194 | 15 |
| Week 1 | 29 | 1,031 | 1,958 |
| Week 2 | 33 | 1,229 | 2,209 |
| Week 3 | 39 | 1,390 | 2,527 |
| Week 4 | 36 | 1,307 | 2,459 |
| Week 5 | 21 | 791 | 1,459 |
| Week 6 | 18 | 738 | 1,307 |
| Week 7 | 3 | 147 | 218 |
| District Champs | 24 | 1,031 | 1,880 |
| Championship | 9 | 645 | 997 |
| Offseason | 86 | 1,415 | 1,590 |
By kind of event
as the season runs them| Kind | Events | Entries | Top EPAM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preseason | 12 | 194 | 114.2 |
| Regional | 56 | 2,455 | 128.8 |
| District | 123 | 4,178 | 129.0 |
| District Champs | 24 | 1,031 | 184.6 |
| Championship | 9 | 645 | 244.5 |
| Offseason | 86 | 1,415 | 127.9 |
Where the season was played
≥2 events| # | Place | Events | Entries | Top EPAM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Michigan | 38 | 1,345 | 138.9 |
| 2 | Texas | 28 | 1,198 | 171.2 |
| 3 | California | 26 | 819 | 164.8 |
| 4 | Canada | 18 | 501 | 162.6 |
| 5 | Minnesota | 15 | 413 | 113.4 |
| 6 | Massachusetts | 11 | 422 | 180.9 |
| 7 | Türkiye | 10 | 354 | 105.6 |
| 8 | New York | 10 | 348 | 130.2 |
| 9 | Wisconsin | 10 | 277 | 118.5 |
| 10 | Arizona | 9 | 133 | 91.7 |
| 11 | Pennsylvania | 8 | 283 | 132.7 |
| 12 | Washington | 8 | 207 | 154.6 |
